Friday follows (expanded edition)

2009_09_mutt_jeff_comic
Way back when (March 11 of 2008 to be exact), I wrote my first entry for DCSpring21.  From the start, I've aspired to write with a clarity or purpose, economy of words and whenever possible, element of humor.  Four years in and I think I've succeeded at times -- and fallen far short in others.  Throughout, the fun part has remained the same: learning and formulating my own perspectives that build on -- and not simply parrot -- opinions and ideas of my peers, colleagues and/or elders.  So I take great delight in endorsing two recent additions to the blogoshphere that are banking-relevant but definitely not boring: 

  • The Beat on the Banks by Patrick McCarthy, recently a member of the asset management team of the $200 billion Capital Purchase Program within the Office of Financial Stability in the U.S. Treasury (I think he needed 2 business cards to get that title spelled out).  Patrick joined us last month as our Director of Client Relations.

Both are up & comers in the banking community, and while age isn't always relevant to an author's credibilty, I did want to point out both are < 30.  For in an industry some deem the provence of "stuffy old men," pretty cool to read their take on what's timely and relevant in the community today, especially when Back to the Future references and artfully drawn cartoons prove more the norm than the exception.

If you're interested in more than just their weekly thoughts, follow Kelsey & Patrick on Twitter -- and find out more about their backgrounds with LinkedIn.  Kelsey is en route from sunny San Diego to live and work in D.C. (why anyone would want to leave southern Cal is beyond me)... and Patrick has to be stoked to be working a mere two blocks from his high school (Gonzaga).  I think you'll enjoy their wit and style.

Staying relevant? A look back to #AOBA12

In my next few posts, I'll share some of the key takeaways from various presentations made at last week's Acquire or Be Acquired (AOBA) conference.  As you may have read, I had the pleasure of introducing a number of our speakers over the three day event -- a culmination of a year's worth of effort for the Bank Director team.  Leading up to the conference, I spoke with many of the participants as they framed their information and insight for an audience of 550+ bank CEOs, CFOs, Chairmen and board members from banks that ranged from a few hundred million in assets to nearly $17Bn in size.  Up first: a workshop presented by our friends at Griffin Financial entitled "How Do You Make Your Bank Relevant in Today’s Consolidating Industry?"

Charliebrown
The first time I met Mark McCollom, I had just downed three cups of coffee & was trying to shake a long night of travel from my eyes.  It was Jan. 30, 2011 -- an early Sunday morning to be exact -- and I'd just entered a conference room in at the Hyatt Gainey Ranch in Arizona chocked full of talkative bankers eager to hear from the former CFO at Sovereign Bank and his colleagues at Griffin Financial.  Mark, now the Senior Managing Director at the investment bank, was speaking on the first time spot at last year's AOBA -- and I'd been back with Bank Director for only a few months so we hadn't met.  While I'd prepared to welcome everyone to our conference, I quickly realized the time for small talk between the two of us would have to wait until after his two hour presentation... a real problem, as I couldn't find his bio.  Thank goodness their Chairman (who was leading the presentation) bailed me out by introducing Mark to the crowd!

Fortunately, this year's intro went far smoother than last -- much needed, in fact, as it was Mark leading this year's workshop. So "taking a bailout" was not an option as we opened AOBA with his presentation on staying relevant to potential merger partners and/or investors who provide growth capital.  With a 80+ page deck, let me share some of the more salient points of Mark's presentation (IMHO):

  • Over the past 10 Years, large banks have typically out-earned smaller banks due to both size & scale + an ability to leverage operating expenses.
  • Returns for community banks will continue to suffer, with margin compression due to increased competition and flatter yield curves, higher capital requirements under Dodd-Frank and Basel III and more severe risk weighting.
  • As recently as 5 years ago, a moderately performing community bank could gain access to public capital sources. This has largely dried up in recent quarters.

To the merger-side of his talk, many are on record that banks < $1 Billion in assets should seriously consider selling their bank (or tying up with a similar sized institution).  While I know quite a few CEOs under this threshold who have absolutely no interest in selling, Mark did share stats like these:

  • About 2% of small banks (<$250 million) have sold each year since 2008, and represent about 67-81% of total M&A volume each year, despite being only 66% of the total number of financial institutions
  • The median relative size of seller assets has shifted upward from 13% in 2005 to 18.5% in 2011 – according to Mark, this implies lower premiums are allowing banks the opportunity to grow more quickly when they do transact a deal and a greater willingness to pursue a merger of equals

While many factors ultimately impact “relevance” for banks today, Mark ultimately believes it comes down to generating the best returns for shareholders when taken in light of attracting investor or acquirer interest.  Agree or disagree?  Feel free to weigh in below.

##

*If you attended the conference, you can access all of Mark's slides using the "on demand" feature on BankDirector.com (under the past conference tab on the site).

Point - Counterpoint at Bank Director's AOBA

Biltmore-lawn-ft
Earlier this week, I had the opportunity to moderate a point/counterpoint panel discussion at our 18th annual Acquire or Be Acquired conference at the Arizona Biltmore.  A fixture on the agenda*, we once again invited four panelists to join me on stage & respond to five "deal-or-grow" type statements by indicating their position (pro or con).  Based on their perspectives, we subsequently polled an audience of 500+ bank CEOs, CFOs, Chairmen and board members to ascertain what these officers & directors think will happen in 2012.

Photo

Joining me on stage this year were Steve Hovde, the President & Chief Executive Officer @ the Hovde Group, Ron Janis, a partner at the law firm of Day Pitney, Doug McClintock a Partner at Alston & Bird and Michael Mayes, Managing Director, Raymond James.  A tip of my cap to each of them; all four did a tremendous job sharing their thoughts within the 2 minute window with relevant stats, anecdotes and outlooks that benefited the audience.

Let me share the takeaways from this 50-minute session.  While my first statement -- that the primary obstacle to increased M&A activity in 2012 will the unrealistic price expectations of sellers -- split the room vote, things started to get interesting with point #2.  Yup, the vote trended towards a "disagree" position when I said "banks that are thinking about selling would be better off waiting until 2013 when valuations will be higher than they are likely to be in 2012."  

By statement #3 -- "Increased bank and accounting regulation will be a driving factor in why many community banks consider selling" -- the vibe in the crowd began to trend toward more disagreement than agreement from the crowd.  But nothing like the 4th point -- one that had the crowd voting in mass against my statement that M&A will be the only way to grow in 2012.  Almost 90% took the side of the cons.  So while we wait for the seemingly inevitable wave of consolidation, it seems to me that this year sets up nicely for all those companies looking to help banks explore organic means to grow their franchises.

(*Here's how this session works: two attorneys and two investment bankers have 2 minutes per statement to argue their position.  After that, I open things up to the audience to decide if they agree or disagree with the statement, weighing in via an automated response device that tabulate 500+ votes in near-real time.)

Say what?

Last June, as part of the Bank Director / Grant Thornton Bank Executive Survey, our team asked CEOs, CFOs and audit committee members for their outlook on the U.S. economy. Slightly more than half of respondents (52%) believed the economy would remain the same over the next six months.  Another 39% believed it would improve and only 9% believed it would get worse. Gotta love the optimists among us!

With these figures in place, my favorite editor, Jack Milligan, and the head of Grant Thornton's financial institutions group, Nichole Jordan, just wrapped up an interesting & interactive session here at our Acquire or Be Acquired conference.  The two posed some pretty interesting questions to a very full room.  For instance, where else can you ask Chairmen, CEOs and CFOs what they feel the top risk is currently facing their bank -- and get near real-time answers?  Unfortunately, I didn't capture the percentages, but answers involved credit risk, liquidity risk, IT risk or compliance risk due to uncertain regulatory developments.  

With this particular event focused on M&A and growth issues, it was not surprising that Nichole posed another question that got the crowd buzzing.  Specifically, what is the top way your bank plans to grow over the next year?  Answers included:

  • Organic loan origination;
  • Purchase of loan pools; 
  • M&A;
  • Lease finance;
  • Non-lending investment activities; and
  • Using more advantageous tax strategies and structures

While Nichole & her team at Grant Thornto are seeing healthy M&A activity in the industry, she was quick to note activity has yet to return to pre-recession levels.  In her words, many banks are viewing mergers as a viable way to grow in today’s environment and others are pursuing mergers as a way of dealing with increased regulatory demands. 

She also cautioned that an area that needs to be better thoroughly addressed is post-integration activities.  I'm paraphrasing, but her take is banks, their advisers and accounting firms do exhaustive work preparing the books, but the key to a successful merger is largely what happens after the transaction. Perhaps most importantly, how will you blend the two cultures of both institutions? Communication and leadership are essential in making sure the acquisition is a success.  So some really intereting discussions taking place on a Monday -- this being one I had a few minutes to write up.  More to come...

You can find the optimist at the 23 sec mark

Not a tremendously long post today.  I guess you could say that I'm saving up for for our Acquire or Be Acquired conference (that you can follow using #AOBA12 and/or @bankdirector) that kicks off this Sunday.

Recently, I've had a lot to celebrate -- a new baby boy, the Patriots advancing to the Super Bowl and an unbelievably awesome experience of ringing the closing bell at the NASDAQ MarketSite in NYC in December.  As we did last year, we will again assemble a dynamic group of industry leaders to examine the board's role in lending.  Yup, we are all set to do so again in Times Square in early December.  So, as we spin up our marketing machine, I'll do my best to provide insight on how we decide to use different tools and techniques to promote our second go-round at the MarketSite.  Want a sneak peek of the kinds of messaging we're putting together?  Here's a 30-second video we will begin to share this weekend:

Buy vs. Build -- a decision you'll have to make

A fun Friday observation: where there is a strong bank & board, we regularly find a Chairman or a CEO determined to make his or her institution better.  Anecdotal?  Perhaps... but one gleaned from a number of conversations me and my colleagues have had over the past seventeen months. In fact, this executive interest in making a real commitment to the education of ones board prompted Bank Director to develop DirectorCorps.  Here's a quick look (with yours truly providing the narrative) at this educational program:

 

Pop quiz: Did you watch this one minute video?  I'm curious, as we find that people are more likely to watch a presentation such as this if it follows six lines or less of text.  Now I know I've been playing a cheerleading role for Bank Director here on DCSpring21 for the past few posts.  So let me put my pom poms down and tie the above video into today's post.

It will come as no surprise that a traditional publishing model has been eclipsed by a new, digital hybrid one.  Consequently, as our business evolves, we are often confronted with the infamous build vs buy decision.  Yes, the classic IT dilemma strikes home for even companies of 20 or so employees.  Now, we believe our long-term success is tied to being at the center of where our "consumer" is.  So that means providing information in multiple formats that can be quickly and easily reviewed and shared.  Of course, providing information -- be it in print, online or even in person -- comes at real cost; hence, the decision(s) to outsource projects or add internal resources.

For the online videos we've begun to produce, we are lucky to have a great shop close to our Nashville headquarters -- Snapshot Interactive.  With the help of Mark, Craig and Ben, we've boosted our capabilities without adding to overhead.  Having initially pushed to build our own in-house team, I'm not afraid to admit that our decision to buy rather than build has proven the better of the two options.